Fama-French Three Factor Model
The Fama-French Three Factor Model is a method used by finance professionals to explain the risk and return of equity portfolios. The Three Factor Model compares a portfolio to three distinct risks found in the equity market to assist in decomposing returns. Before the Three Factor Model, there was the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), a single factor way to explain portfolio returns. This tutorial is a quick explanation of CAPM and the Three Factor Model.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is used in finance to determine a theoretically appropriate required rate of return of any investment. CAPM takes into account the expected riskiness of the stock market, known as “beta”, and compares the riskiness of an investment to market beta. If the beta of any investment is higher than the market, then the expected return is also higher and vice versa. The beta of a diversified portfolio can also be measured and compared to the market beta. If a portfolio has higher beta than the market, it is expected to achieve higher returns and vice versa.
All diversified stock portfolios have beta. After testing CAPM on thousands of portfolios, Eugene Fama and Ken French found that on average, a portfolio’s beta explains about 70% of its actual returns. For example, if a portfolio was up 10%, about 70% of the return can be explained by the advance of all stocks and the other 30% is due to other factors not related to beta.
Explaining 70% of a portfolios return using CAPM is fine, but Fama and French thought they could do better. They designed a more elaborate model that uses three risk factors. In the Fama-French Three Factor model, beta is still the most important risk factor because it still accounts for 70% of the typical diversified portfolio return. However, the size of the stocks in a portfolio and the price-to-book value of the stocks made significant differences.
Size is the second risk factor in the Three Factor Model. This factor compares the weighted average market value of the stocks in a portfolio to the weighted average market value of stocks on the market. Small stocks tend to act very differently than big stocks in almost all market conditions. In the long run, small stocks have generated higher returns than large stocks, although the extra return is not free. There is more risk in small stocks. Fama and French call size risk a different yet important factor in portfolio returns.
The third factor compares the amount of value stock exposure in relation to the market. Value stocks are companies that tend have lower earnings growth rates, higher dividends, and higher book value compared to price (BtM). Fama-French measured the performance of high BtM stocks (value stocks) against low BtM stock (growth stocks) and found that these two styles act very differently. In the long run, value stocks have generated higher returns than growth stocks, albeit because value stocks have higher risk.
Fama-French tested thousands of random stock portfolios against their model and found that a combination of beta, size, and value explained 95% of a diversified portfolio’s return.Fama-French tested thousands of random stock portfolios against their model and found that a combination of beta, size, and value explained 95% of a diversified portfolio’s return. In other words, when analyzing the returns of a diversified stock portfolio against the stock market, 95% of the return could be explained by the portfolio’s sensitivity to the market (beta), the size of stocks in the portfolio (size), and the average weighted book-to-market (BtM). The Fama-French Three Factor Model was far better than the 70% explanatory power of beta alone using CAPM.
The portfolios engineered at Portfolio Solutions take into consideration three-factor methodology. We start with a beta position in the total markets (US and foreign) and then add US and foreign small cap value stock index funds to “tilt” the portfolio toward size and value factors.
Although our equity portfolios are designed to outperform the stock market over the long-term based on three-factor engineering, this expected outperformance is only a result of an increase in total risks of beta, size, and BtM combined.
These risks can also get the best of an investor at times. Portfolios that were tilted to small-cap value stocks underperformed the market 1 year out of 3 since the 1930s. They can also be unreliable over longer periods of time. The figure below illustrates the relative performance of small-cap value stocks versus the total US stock market over independent 5 year periods since 1980.
(Source: Ken French data library)
There were 2 periods in 6 over the past 30 years when the annualized return of the market portfolio outperformed small cap value stocks. There was also one unusually high period of outperformance from 2000-04. This incredible period delivered over 21 percent annualized excess return for small cap value stocks, the highest relative performance since the 1940s.
The recent past performance of small cap value tilted portfolios has led to high investor interest in this strategy. Many investments have also jumped on the bandwagon and are heavily promoting the concept.
It is our recommendation that investors approach this strategy with a clear head and a long-term commitment. We do expect three-factor investing to benefit portfolios over time, however the recent extraordinary premiums from this strategy should not be expected to repeat anytime soon.
For more information and further reference, read Understanding Risk and Return, the CAPM, and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model made available by the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth.